Project Orekhov has conducted an in-depth literature review to evaluate the state of the field. This has allowed the team to work diligently towards a working solution ascertained from the failures and success of other devices. Project Orekhov identified two primary categories of devices that provide assistance to the hand and upper limb: therapeutic devices, and engineering (research) devices. A brief explanation of each type of device is provided below.
Bridging the gap between engineering devices and therapeutic devices
Benefits | Shortcomings |
---|---|
Light and Portable | Little or no dynamic assistance |
Affordable | Little to no research potential |
Easily adjustable | One device adresses one function |
Low maintenance | Relies on straps, buckles, and fasteners |
Verified clinical benefit |
Benefits | Shortcomings |
---|---|
Dynamic assistance | Bulky and Heavy |
Precise controllability | Expensive |
Multiple degrees of freedom | Often uncomfortable |
Provides direct feedback | Clinical benefit is rarely verified |
High maintenance |