Design

Design Alternatives

Design alternatives differ in the type of roof. The deflection beam will be attached to the 2nd floor system for all design alternatives as pictured below. Windows are not pictured in the simple design alternatives.
Design 1 has a shed roof incorporated into the structure. 
Design 2 has an Open Gable incorporated into the structure. 
Design 3 has an M Shape incorporated into the structure.

Please Click Here to Refer to the Timber-Strong Design Build 2025 Rules for Further Information on Design Criteria and Constraints.

DESIGN 1

DESIGN 2

DESIGN 3

Back To Top

Decision Matrices

Design Decision Matrix

The proposed structure was evaluated and selected using the table below. Key criteria components were used such as the structural integrity, cost, constructability, aesthetics, functionality, and sustainability. A scale of 1 to 3 was used used to rate each criteria, with 3 being the best rating. Each design then had a totaled value to provide a form of comparison. The highest scored Design was Design 3. This approach ensures a balanced decision.

Timber Type Decision Matrix

The proposed Timber Type selection was evaluated using the table below that based its criteria on cost, strength, and workability. 

Grade Decision Matrix

(Coming Soon)

Back To Top

Final Design

(Coming Soon CENE 486 Spring Semester)

Roof Design

(COMING SOON)

learn more

Wall Design

(COMING SOON)

learn more

Floor Design

(COMING SOON)

learn more
Back to Top

Construction Costs

Construction Costs includes billable rates for personnel, travel costs, lab use daily rates, and material cost for the construction of the final design. Travel costs include to and from the competition in Tucson, AZ, lodging, and food. This comes out to a total cost of $144,110.

Back to Top