Table of Contents

Introduction. 2

Project Understanding. 3

Purpose of the Project. 3

Project Specifications. 6

Challenges. 7

Scope of Services. 8

Task 1- Site Assessment. 8

Task 2- BNSF Railroad Bridge Assessment. 9

Task 2.1 – Visual Assessment. 9

Task 2.2 – Structural Evaluation. 9

Task 3 – Site Design. 10

Task 4- Abutment Design. 10

Task 5- Prefabricated Bridge Research. 10

Task 6- Cost Analysis. 11

Schedule. 12

 


 

Introduction

Pons Pontis Inc. will collaborate with the City of Flagstaff in the design of a new pedestrian bridge located along the trail system east of Flagstaff in Picture Canyon Preserve and Cultural Park. Our proposal for the replacement bridge is outlined in the following sections:

-         Project Understanding

-         Scope of Services

-         Schedule

Work hours and fee estimates are attached in a separate envelope.

 


 

Project Understanding

Purpose of the Project


The goal of the project is to determine the best solution for the replacement of a wooden walkway bridge located in Picture Canyon, crossing the Rio De Flag northwest of the Wildcat Hill Waste Water Treatment Plant, at the junction of three separate trails. The Arizona Trail, the Flagstaff Urban Trail System, and the Educational Loop Trail all connect at one location where a small (15-feet wide) pedestrian bridge is currently located, see Figure 1.

 

As the figure above displays, the project site is located on the east side of Flagstaff. Figure 2 below is a trail systems map for the Picture Canyon Preserve and Cultural Park. The intersections of the three trails, where the bridge is located, is outlined in red.

 

As Figure 2 displays, the bridge is located at the intersection of three trails, the Arizona Trail, the Flagstaff Urban Trail System, and the Educational Loop Trail, within Picture Canyon Preserve and Cultural Park.

Recently the embankments of the Rio De Flag in this area were widened due to changes made to the stream conditions, causing the current bridge to be too small for the system. The current condition is not ideal but it is also not a critical concern, therefore the project will be implemented in about three to four years. Figure 3 below displays the current condition of the wooden walkway bridge.

 

The purpose of this project is to evaluate the current state of a larger (16-feet by 80-feet), donated Burlington Northern Santé Fe (BNSF) railway bridge to be placed in lieu of the existing wooden walkway bridge. Figure 4 displays the BNSF railway bridge under evaluation.

Displayed above is the BNSF railway bridge that is under consideration as a pedestrian bridge as a replacement for the wooden walkway bridge.

 

Project Specifications

With the ever-changing flood plains of the local area, the required larger bridge will support pedestrians, equestrian personnel, and bicyclists as well as service vehicles. Since the City of Flagstaff does not have a bridge design code, the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012) and the AISC Steel Code will be the technical standards designed to. The abutments for the new walkway will be built higher to accommodate the 100-year flood plain of the Picture Canyon Preserve and Cultural Park, as well. All site details, including the 100-year flood plain elevation and topographic maps, will be provided to us by the City of Flagstaff. A condition evaluation of the BNSF bridge will take place, checking for any signs of rust, serious damage, and bent bars or beams. Existing conditions of the site will later be determined after a site visit is scheduled with the main stakeholders which include: Bret Petersen (Senior Project Manager), Karl Eberhard (Community Design and Redevelopment Manager), and Martin Ince (Multi-Modal Planner), all of whom work for the City of Flagstaff. Additionally, the users of the trail systems, including hikers, bicyclists, and equestrian personnel, are important investors in this pathway.

 

Challenges

Some of the many potential challenges that face this project include possibly changing the location of the bridge crossing, realigning the trail, and the transportation of the donated BNSF railway bridge from its current location in Joseph City to the project site. Also determining the exact point at which the bridge BSNF is deemed unusable will have to be under significant evaluation.

Succeeding with this project will entail many project site visits to determine existing conditions of the channel and conditions of the BNSF bridge. This project’s main scope is to replace the current walkway with one with a much better fit to the channel, raised to accommodate to the 100-year flood plain, while keeping the costs low.


 

Scope of Services

In order to consult in the replacement of the bridge located in Picture Canyon, at the intersection of the Arizona Trail, Flagstaff Urban Trail System and the Educational Loop Trail, our team will complete several aspects of this project. Our team’s scope of services includes the following tasks:

Task 1- Site Assessment

Task 2- BNSF Railroad Bridge Assessment

            Task 2.1 - Visual Assessment

            Task 2.2 – Structural Evaluation

Task 3- Site Design

Task 4- Abutment Design

Task 5- Prefabricated Bridge Research

Task 6- Cost Analysis

 

Task 1- Site Assessment

The site assessment will entail a site visit and an analysis of the channel slopes, channel widths and current path locations. The Rio de Flag flood plain data will be gathered from the City of Flagstaff. Once this information is gathered, the best crossing location will be determined based off of vicinity to current trails, accessibility for construction of the bridge, grades of the trail and dimensions of the bridge. If the location of the bridge is changed, the slopes of channel walls, and grades leading to the bridge will need to be assessed for usability, and the paths will be realigned. Transportation of the truss into site will need to be analyzed, determining if any vegetation of the surrounding area will need to be cut, there are semi-truck assessable roads leading into the site, and how the truss will be placed exactly in the desired location over the channel.

Deliverables:   Report of site assessment

 

Task 2- BNSF Railroad Bridge Assessment

An option for the replacement bridge is to use an out of service BNSF railroad bridge located in Joseph City. The railroad bridge that is under consideration as the replacement bridge will undergo a conditions assessment. The conditions assessment of the bridge will include a structural stability evaluation, historical background study of the bridge, and a health and safety evaluation, for example the presence of lead paint. A lab test will be completed to determine the presence of lead based paint.

 

Task 2.1 – Visual Assessment

A visual assessment will be conducted to determine if any rust, section loss or large truss member deflections. The bridge will also be assessed based on additional fixtures that would need to be added in order to make the bridge usable. Any section losses or deflections will be measured.

Deliverables: Bridge assessment report

 

Task 2.2 – Structural Evaluation

An evaluation of the existing bridge will be conducted. Our team will determine the material properties of the bridge either from the BNSF bridge records or similar time period bridge records. Our team will be modeling and analyzing the truss based on the capacity of the bridge verses the demand on the bridge. The capacity of the bridge will be determined based on the material properties, type and dimensions of the truss, and the presence of section loss and deflections. The demand on the bridge will be related to the maximum expected design loading. The maximum loading will be based on the heaviest weight service vehicle as specified by the City of Flagstaff. Checks will be performed comparing the capacity to the load demand of the BNSF truss. The capacity to demand specifications will be evaluated against the standards set by the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012) and the AISC Steel Code. A finite element analysis (FEA) computer software program titled SAP2000 will aid in the analysis.

Deliverables:   Capacity and loading report

SAP2000 report

 

Task 3 – Site Design

Any topographic data and maps will be provided by the City of Flagstaff to aid our team in the overall site layout. The abutments required for the truss to fit properly will have established locations and elevations, once the site is assessed. A visual analysis of the slopes of each trail will need to be performed to determine the height of the abutments and how much, if any, fill will be required to maintain ease of accessibility.

            Deliverables: Plan and profile sheets

 

Task 4- Abutment Design

Abutments will be sized by our team and designed respectively to fit the given bridge design to prevent any “washing away” and/or damage to the bridge during times of flooding. This portion of the Rio de Flag channel has been recently widened to accommodate a 100-year flood plain of the local area. The widening has provided easement for the meandering stream of the channel and any wastewater runoff from the nearby Wildcat Hill Wastewater Treatment Facility located upstream of the ideal bridge location. Once an assessment of the 100-year flood plain for the Picture Canyon area has been compiled, abutments will need to be designed accordingly for the new bridge. The abutments will provide a more stable structure, prevent any damage from the channel onto or underneath the bridge, and to benefit the users with easier access to and from the pathway.

Deliverables:   Structural design calculations

Plan and profile sheets

 

Task 5- Prefabricated Bridge Research

Another option for the replacement bridge is to order a prefabricated bridge. The main purpose of this task is to gain a cost determination for a prefabricated bridge that would span the river channel versus the cost determination for refurbishing the BNSF truss.

Deliverables:   Cost analysis

 

Task 6- Cost Analysis

The cost of the BNSF railroad bridge and the cost of the prefabricated bridge will be compared. The cost of the railroad bridge will be dependent on additional fixtures, transportation, accessibility, and adjustments made to the bridge for health and safety reasons. On the other hand, the prefabricated bridge will have set cost based on the dimensions of the bridge.

Deliverables:   Cost comparison

                                    Bridge recommendation

 


 

Schedule